Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy Xcover 4S. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a lot bigger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 32 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.