Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-12 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover 5, with a global score of 81 against 78.1. LG G7 ThinQ is an incredibly older device than the Galaxy XCover 5, but it is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11, giving some extra features and a performance increase.
LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG G7 ThinQ features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger screen, a lot greater pixel density and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ features a battery duration that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 one.
The LG G7 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.