Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 global score. LG V35 ThinQ's body is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released many years before. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and way more pixels per inch of screen. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher (4K) video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.