Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 5, with a general score of 81.2 against 78.1. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is older than Galaxy XCover 5, it's body is a bit lighter and thinner.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a lot greater pixels amount per inch of display and a larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.