Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 5, with an 81.9 score against 78.1. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is noticeably newer, a little bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover 5. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy XCover 5 features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way greater pixel count per inch of display, a lot better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more MP camera in the back. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.