Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | LTPS |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover 5, having a general score of 81.5 against 78.1. These devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G 5G has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version. Even being the best device we compare here, Motorola Moto G 5G's design is a little thicker and heavier than Galaxy XCover 5.
The Moto G 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater pixel number in each screen inch and a larger display. Moto G 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better resolution back camera, a larger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. The Moto G 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.