Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5's score of 78.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50s is older than Galaxy XCover 5, it's design is thinner and a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a larger display and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A50s has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.