Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's global score of 78.1. Even though Galaxy Note 20 and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 body is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.