Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 global score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and much heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but Samsung managed to make it a bit thinner anyway. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot bigger screen, a way higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.