| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Vivo X70 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a general score of 78.3 against 77.6. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X70 Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. The vivo X70 Pro body is noticeably lighter and much thinner than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released around 9 months before.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit less pixels per inch of screen, they both have a display with the same size. The vivo X70 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 50 MP resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4450mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.