Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 81.3 against 80.1. The Google Pixel XL is an extremely older phone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is thinner and much lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little bit higher screen density. Google Pixel XL shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, it also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Google Pixel XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.