Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting an 80.1 score against 78.3. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device than vivo X70 Pro, we must tell that it is also older, notably heavier and extremely thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers a lot of extra features.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro features a better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro's battery performance is just as good as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, although the vivo X70 Pro has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Vivo X70 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.