Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having an 81 score against 80.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it is heavier and extremely thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 XL and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro have extremely similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 3 XL has a back facing camera with much less megapixels and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way larger back camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.