Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. The Google Pixel 4 construction is thinner and way lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released with only 3 months difference. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels per display inch. Galaxy XCover Pro and Google Pixel 4 have quite similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a lot lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.