Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a overall score of 82.2 against 81. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s body is much thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has the newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a brighter display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a higher pixels number per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a much better video definition and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.