Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a general score of 84.3 against 81. The LG G8 ThinQ body is much lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 10 months before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, so it provides you some extra features and performance optimizations.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The LG G8 ThinQ shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a way higher video resolution and a larger aperture. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.