Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 82.5 score against 81. The LG G8S ThinQ is a incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both were released with only a few months difference. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8S ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and some performance improvements.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2248px resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG G8S ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video quality. LG G8S ThinQ has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.