Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the LG Q70's score of 77.9. Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat heavier and thicker phone than LG Q70. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little faster processor than LG Q70. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. LG Q70 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG Q70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 features a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a much more MP back camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than LG Q70, because it has a 1% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro costs more money than LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.