Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. These phones have Android OS, but the LG Wing has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and heavier cellphone.
Galaxy XCover Pro and LG Wing have extremely similar displays, because although the LG Wing has a quite inferior pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger display. The LG Wing features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
The LG Wing counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG Wing has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little longer battery life than LG Wing, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.