Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a extremely newer phone, and it's also incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bit higher pixels amount in each inch of display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more mega pixels back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.