Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is much newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, giving a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.