Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G100 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 88.9 against 81. These devices come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Moto G100 is a newer phone, and it's also a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Moto G100 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G100 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G100 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a greater number of pixels per screen inch, the Moto G100 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little bigger display.
The Moto G100 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G100 also has a way higher 5760x3240 video resolution, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Motorola Moto G100 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Moto G100 counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.