Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Play, having a overall score of 81 against 76.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than Motorola Moto G9 Play, we must tell that it's also a little thicker and just a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a sharper display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better count of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Galaxy XCover Pro, both have the same 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G9 Play counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Moto G9 Play counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.