Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is older and just a bit thicker than Moto G9 Power, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel count per display inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Moto G9 Power counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Moto G9 Power also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Moto G9 Power counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and higher video frame rate.
Moto G9 Power counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.