Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 81.1 score against 81. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, counting with some additional features and a performance increase. Motorola razr (2022)'s body is incredibly newer, just a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit lower pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2022) takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.