Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having a overall score of 88.1 against 81. The Galaxy F62 body is newer, a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy F62 features a processor that's very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Galaxy F62 has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.