Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 89 score against 81. Galaxy Note10 is a noticeably lighter and a lot thinner device than Galaxy XCover Pro, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little lower display pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, they both have a display with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Note10 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.