Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give you the same OS features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a somewhat lighter and much thinner device than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.