Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, with an 81 score against 78.3. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide all the same operating system features.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X70 Pro and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro have quite similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X70 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.