Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Black | Black and Ceramic |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, with a overall score of 81 against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is much lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, but it's extremely thicker and was released about a year before. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a better 1860 x 2480px resolution and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.