Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-02-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.31 x 2.31 x 0.49 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 175 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB (200 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Young's 54.8 score. LG V50 ThinQ's body is way newer and much thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Young's, although it is much heavier. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Young has Android 4.1.2.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Young, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a lot higher count of pixels per screen inch and a lot larger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior processing power than Galaxy Young, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 5,25 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Young, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video quality. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Young, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Young, because it has a 208 percent more battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.