Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. These devices have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should offer very similar operating system features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an older cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but it is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a little bit better screen pixel density, a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. The vivo X70 Pro's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip 5G's one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although the vivo X70 Pro has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X70 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments and a lot more MP camera.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.