Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a general score of 88.5 against 80.7. Galaxy Z Flip's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a less MP back-facing camera, they both have the same sensor size and a same size aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.