Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 3a. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a lesser mega pixels resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same sensor size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.