Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, with an 88.5 score against 82.9. Although the Galaxy Z Flip and Google Pixel 4a were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip body is somewhat thinner but extremely heavier than Google Pixel 4a. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features and optimized performance.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a screen that is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip's display, because although the Google Pixel 4a has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display density. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a lower (4K) video definition, a tinier aperture and a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, they both have the same camera sensor size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.