Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than LG V10's score of 78.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Galaxy Z Flip is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than LG V10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better performing CPU than LG V10, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The LG V10 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density and a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG V10 has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V10 captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V10. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V10, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.