Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is also somewhat heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and LG V35 ThinQ have similar battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a much lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.