Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, getting an 88.5 score against 87.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, it's body is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version, providing you a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with better 120 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.