Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40's general score of 77.2. The Galaxy Z Flip is a way older and just a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung managed to make it a little thinner anyway. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, a bit smaller display and a little lower pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 features longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Motorola Edge 40 takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a much larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.