Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an 88.5 score against 77. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is a little bit thinner than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it's just a bit heavier and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.