Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Moto G6 Plus's 77.5 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than the Moto G6 Plus, it's just a bit thinner and newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a little higher screen pixel density and a little larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.