Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Moto G71 5G's overall score of 82.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and a performance increase. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older and just a little bit heavier than Moto G71 5G, it's body is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better screen than Moto G71 5G, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a bit better pixels density and a bit bigger screen.
Motorola Moto G71 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also has a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G71 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.