Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a notably newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play, but it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with better video frame rate.
Moto Z2 Play features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.