Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2023-03-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Carbon Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Motorola ThinkPhone's score of 78.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Motorola ThinkPhone has Android 13 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Z Flip is incredibly older than the Motorola ThinkPhone, it's body is just a little lighter and thinner.
Motorola ThinkPhone features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola ThinkPhone, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger number of cores.
The Motorola ThinkPhone features a camera that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's camera, and although the Motorola ThinkPhone has a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs, they both have a same size aperture.
Motorola ThinkPhone has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Galaxy Z Flip, they have exactly the same internal memory. Motorola ThinkPhone has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.