Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Polar night |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Nokia 8.3 5G, having an 88.5 score against 80.5. Even when the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Nokia 8.3 5G were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processing unit than Nokia 8.3 5G. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, a lower video quality and a much worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a slightly better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Nokia 8.3 5G features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 8.3 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.