Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a overall score of 88.5 against 75.8. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released only 4 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S and Galaxy Z Flip count with similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.