Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 76.2. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features. The Galaxy Z Flip is a a lot thinner and lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, although both were released with only a couple of months difference.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower screen pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size screen. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.