Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 88.5 score against 83.1. The Galaxy Z Flip is a thinner and lighter phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although both were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, providing you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Galaxy Z Flip, and although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has 4 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.