Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A31's 81.3 general score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a just a bit lighter and thinner cellphone than Galaxy A31, even though both were released only a couple of months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A31 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A31 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.