Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), having an 88.5 score against 85.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction has the same weight than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), but it's just a little bit thinner. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a quite greater pixel density and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 15% bigger battery size. Galaxy A9 (2018) takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.